LTE, MVR ve MEE'yi karşılaştırma

Düşük Sıcaklık Buharlaştırıcı (LTE), Mekanik Buhar Sıkıştırma (MVR) ve Çoklu Etkili Buharlaştırıcı (MEE) Arasındaki Karşılaştırma

As zero liquid discharge (ZLD) and wastewater concentration become increasingly critical in industries like hazardous waste treatment, chemical processing, and landfill leachate management, selecting the right evaporation technology is essential. This brochure compares three widely used systems and outlines why low-temperature vacuum evaporators are often the best solution.

Key Advantages of Low-Temperature Vacuum Evaporator (LTE)

Lower Operating Costs

With OPEX between 50–60 RMB/ton, LTE consumes significantly less energy, particularly because it does not rely on steam or high-pressure compressors like MVR or MEE.

No Steam or Circulating Water Dependency

Traditional evaporators require boilers, steam, and circulating water systems, increasing infrastructure and maintenance burden. LTE systems only require electricity, making them ideal for water-scarce regions or remote installations.

Skid-Mounted, Plug & Play Design

LTE units are fully assembled and factory-tested. No civil works or on-site assembly are required, reducing commissioning time and cost.

High Automation

One-click start, no dedicated operators needed. This reduces labor cost and the risk of human error during operation.

Excellent for Scaling-Prone or Sticky Wastewater

Operates at low temperatures, which slows down scaling and reduces salt crystallization on heat exchangers.

Self-cleaning features and anti-fouling heat exchanger design extend service intervals.

Particularly effective for mother liquor from landfill leachate, high-salt industrial brines, and pharmaceutical residues.

Consistent Water Quality

The distillate from LTE systems is clean and stable, often meeting reuse or discharge standards without further polishing.

Challenges of MVR & MEE

　　· High temperature operation causes frequent scaling.

　　· Requires skilled operators for steam and compressor balancing.

　 · High cleaning and maintenance costs, especially for brine and organic-rich wastewater.

Comparative summary of LTE, MVR and MEE

Öğe	LTE (Kayma) MVR	MVR	MEE (İki/Üç Etki)
İşletme Maliyeti (OPEX)	50–60 RMB/ton	90–100 RMB/ton	110–140 RMB/ton
Kurulum	Kızak üzerine monte edilmiş, tak ve çalıştır	Geniş alan kullanımı, yerinde çalışma	Geniş alan kullanımı, kapsamlı kurulum
Otomasyon Tam otomatik, operatör yok	Tam otomatik, operatör yok	Manuel işlem gereklidir	Manuel işlem gereklidir
Bakım	Kolay temizlik, düşük risk	Tıkanmaya/kirlenmeye eğilimli	Yüksek ölçeklendirme, yüksek temizleme maliyeti
Enerji Verimliliği	Düşük enerji, buhara gerek yok	Gizli ısının iyi bir şekilde yeniden kullanılması	Yüksek buhar tüketimi
Konsantrasyon Oranı	Yüksek (tipik olarak 8–10 kat)	Ilıman	Ilıman
Uygunluk	Yapışkan, kireçlenmeye eğilimli, karmaşık atık su	Kararlı, düşük kireçli su	Büyük hacimli, düşük karmaşıklıktaki atık